The Judge | Heritage Briefs - Episode #13
Click Here to Listen to this Episode
💬 Show Notes:
In this episode of the Morning Star Heritage Briefs, Chuck Christie discusses the importance of a strong and independent judiciary in the American Republic. Drawing on insights from Rick Joyner, he examines the challenges posed by judicial tyranny and the need for judicial accountability. Christie emphasizes the founders' vision of a constitutional republic and the dangers of a politicized legal system, highlighting the necessity for ongoing evaluation of judges and justices.
Tune in to explore the foundational principles that can guide the nation back to its constitutional roots.
🗣️ Quotes from Rick Joyner
"Judicial tyranny may presently be the greatest threat to the republic."
"The main purpose of the Constitution was to limit the authority of the federal government."
"If we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
📝 Blog Post Body:
In the latest edition of the Morning Star Heritage Briefs, Chuck Christie takes listeners on a thought-provoking journey through the complexities of the American judicial system. This episode, titled "The Judge Heritage Brief 13," is inspired by Rick Joyner's writings and highlights the crucial role of a strong, independent judiciary in maintaining the integrity of the American Republic.
Christie emphasizes that judicial tyranny is currently one of the greatest threats to the republic. He argues that while we have faced challenges from wayward judges, many have remained committed to justice and the rule of law. The founders of our nation understood the importance of judicial accountability, which is why they were wary of lifetime judicial appointments. They believed that no government official should be exempt from accountability, and lifetime appointments can shield judges from necessary oversight.
As Christie elaborates, the founders were concerned not only with the tyranny of a king but also with the tyranny of the mob. They envisioned a constitutional republic where representatives would act in the best interest of the nation, rather than merely catering to the whims of public opinion. This understanding is crucial in today's political climate, where the judiciary is often viewed through a partisan lens.
The episode also touches on the founders' fears regarding the moral character of the American people. Christie quotes Thomas Jefferson, who highlighted the importance of an informed and educated citizenry in maintaining the balance of power. As the episode unfolds, listeners are encouraged to reflect on their role in governance and the importance of upholding the principles laid out in the Constitution.
Ultimately, the Morning Star Heritage Briefs serve as a reminder that while the challenges facing our judiciary may seem daunting, it is still possible to restore the constitutional boundaries of our federal government. By understanding the historical context and the intentions of our founders, we can work towards a more just and accountable system.
Don’t miss this enlightening episode! Tune in to gain insight into the foundational principles that can guide our nation back to its roots. Whether you're a history buff or simply someone interested in the future of American governance, this episode is a must-listen!
✍️ Episode References
Rick Joyner
Thomas Jefferson
John Adams
Automatic Shownotes
Chapters
Long Summary
In this lecture, Chuck Christie presents the thirteenth installment of the Morningstar Heritage Briefs, titled "The Judge," authored by Rick Joyner. The discussion centers on the notion that, although restoring the federal government to its constitutional principles may require radical solutions, the nation's foundational strength remains intact. Christie emphasizes the necessity of belief in the possibility of change, recalling the U.S. Navy Construction Battalion's motto to highlight that nothing is impossible for those who serve a higher purpose.
The dialogue progresses to address the current threats facing the republic, with particular emphasis on judicial tyranny as a pressing issue. While acknowledging instances of judicial overreach, Christie affirms that a functional and independent judiciary is crucial for upholding justice within a republic. He reflects on the Founders’ concerns about lifetime appointments for judges, intended to protect judicial independence from political pressures, but which have instead contributed to the politicization of the judicial system. The lecture suggests that judges' terms should be sufficient to mitigate political influence while ensuring accountability and ongoing evaluation based on performance and adherence to the law.
Christie discusses the balance the Founders sought between the tyranny of a single ruler and the potential tyranny of the mob. Drawing on historical references, he underscores that the Founders intended to create a constitutional republic capable of withstanding fluctuations in public opinion. This system was designed to secure the rights of minorities, preventing the "two wolves and a sheep" scenario that characterizes pure democracies. According to Christie, John Adams’ insights into the fleeting nature of democracies underscore the wisdom behind the Founders’ preference for a constitutional republic, in which the Constitution reigns as the ultimate governing authority.
The conversation shifts to the concept of mission creep within the branches of government, asserting that each branch has overstepped its constitutional bounds. Christie warns that as the federal government has expanded its scope beyond legislated limits, it has strayed from its primary functions. He advocates a return to constitutional principles, in which the federal government's powers are strictly defined and regulated, preserving the autonomy of the states and the rights of the people.
The lecture concludes with a call to action for the citizens, positing that true change will likely emerge from grassroots movements. Christie invokes the wisdom of Thomas Jefferson, arguing that educating the populace is essential to preserve their rights and ensure effective oversight of the government. He emphasizes the Founders’ concerns about the moral character of the American citizenry, asserting that maintaining civic virtue and a commitment to civic responsibilities is critical to the nation’s enduring strength. The lecture ultimately asserts that if Americans uphold these democratic principles, the nation will continue to thrive as a beacon of freedom and hope.
Brief Summary
In this lecture, Chuck Christie presents the thirteenth installment of the Morningstar Heritage Briefs, titled "The Judge," focusing on the restoration of the federal government to constitutional principles. He addresses judicial tyranny, emphasizing the importance of a functional judiciary while acknowledging the dangers of judicial overreach. Christie discusses the Founders' intent regarding lifetime judicial appointments and advocates for term limits to foster accountability. The lecture explores the balance between governmental powers and the protection of minority rights, highlighting the Founders' preference for a constitutional republic. Christie also critiques mission creep across government branches and calls for a return to clearly defined constitutional roles. The discussion concludes with a call for grassroots movements and civic education to uphold democratic principles and maintain the nation's strength.
Transcript
[0:08] Introduction to The Judge
[0:10] Hello again, this is Chuck Christie, bringing you another segment of the Morningstar Heritage Briefs. This episode is titled "The Judge," Heritage Brief 13, by Rick Joyner. Although it will take some radical solutions to get our federal government back on track and reconnect it again to its constitutional moorings, we have an amazingly strong and resilient foundation to work with. We must never think it is not possible. If the U.S. Navy Construction Battalion has the motto, " The difficult we do immediately, but the impossible may take a little longer, how much more should we, who serve a God for whom nothing is impossible, believe this? Judicial tyranny may presently be the greatest threat to the republic, but no republic can survive without a strong independent judiciary devoted to justice. Even though we may have suffered much from wayward judges and courts, most have not gone awry, have stayed within their lane, and have done a great service to the country. One of the first ways the Founders saw as an inroad for judicial corruption was for judges, including Supreme Court justices, to have lifetime appointments.
[1:25] They believed that no government official should ever be exempt from accountability, and nothing can likely shield one from it like a lifetime appointment. When this wisdom was disregarded and lifetime appointments to certain seats were made, they were intended to enable judges to rise above political pressure and stay focused on justice.
[1:55] The Perils of Judicial Appointments
[1:49] Lifetime appointments may have seemed like a good remedy for this, but it did not work. Now our judicial system is as politicized as the rest of the government.
[2:01] Every major departure like this from the Constitution has only created worse problems than the ones they were devised to fix. That said, it seems reasonable that judges and justices should have long enough terms to at least mitigate some of the political pressures that can pervert justice. It could be helpful to make the renewal of their terms nearly automatic, but there needs to be ongoing evaluation and accountability for their performance and compliance with the law and the Constitution. Those who would protest the most at having their lifetime appointment removed should probably be the first to be removed. To be a judge is a high calling, and we obviously want those who are above reproach in the courts. Our founders feared the tyranny of the mob as much as they feared the tyranny of a king. The same crowd that welcomed Jesus into Jerusalem, declaring, Hosanna, blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, were crying, crucify him, just five days later. The founders were devoted to establishing a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but also one that could ride out the wild swings of public opinion. These swings can create a social turbulence that tears a nation apart.
[3:31] Democracies are where the majority rules. Republics are where the people vote for representatives that rule on their behalf. The representatives ideally will not just try to please public opinion, which can swing wildly from one extreme to the other, but rather do what is best for the whole country.
[3:54] The Importance of a Constitutional Republic
[3:55] This is why our founders formed a constitutional republic, not a democracy as many wrongly presume. As John Adams noted, no democracy had survived more than a short time before committing suicide. As he also wrote, a democracy is like two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch. Under pure democracies, the rights of minorities tend to get ignored or trampled upon. To ultimately be a nation of justice for all, the Founders knew we had to be a constitutional republic where the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. All three branches of government have been prone to infringe on the authority granted to the other branches, as well as on the authority of the states and the people. The military calls this mission creep when a commander starts adding to their specific assignment. When this happens, the original assignment often gets muddled and sometimes forgotten.
[5:01] Recognizing Authority Limits
[5:01] This has happened in our federal government. It has taken on many purposes that are beyond its constitutional authority.
[5:10] To remedy this, we must remember that the Constitution was written to assign specific authority to the federal government and to forever limit it to what was specifically given to it, in order to preserve the authority of the states and the people. Therefore, assigning any purpose to the federal government not specifically named in the Constitution violates the Constitution; a main purpose of the Constitution was to limit the federal government's authority to keep it from becoming what it has now become. To restore the constitutional boundaries of the federal government, it would be much better for its three branches to be self-correcting. This would require champions of the Constitution to arise in each one to get our government back on the rails. This is still possible. Yet, with every day that passes without the self-correction, the likelihood of it becomes more remote. Therefore, the likely source of change will be from the states and the people.
[6:22] The Moral Character of Citizens
I know no safer depository of the ultimate powers of society than the people themselves. And if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power. Thomas Jefferson.
The Founding Fathers were concerned with the moral principles of the American people more than any other attribute. They were confident their countrymen would always be brave and industrious, but they feared a future decline in their moral character. This fear probably arose from what was known about previous democratic governments. The democracies of the ancient world had fallen apart largely due to a decline in the virtue of their citizens, the people's loss of interest in their voices in governmental decisions, or a lust for power among their leaders. The Founding Fathers believed that if the American people would remain honest and be attentive to their responsibilities as citizens, eschew personal fame and power, and love God, then America would remain a strong force for freedom and hope in the world. Gordon Leidner.
Copyright 2020 by Rick Joyner. All rights reserved.
Comments
Post a Comment