Judicial Tyranny | Heritage Briefs - Episode # 12
Click Here to Listen to This Episode
💬 Show Notes:
In this episode of the Morning Star Heritage Briefs, Chuck Christie delves into the pressing issue of judicial tyranny in America. Drawing from the insights of the Founding Fathers, he emphasizes the importance of adhering to the Constitution and the checks and balances it provides. Christie argues that the current state of government is not a failure of the Constitution itself, but rather a failure to comply with it, particularly within the judicial branch. He discusses the historical implications of unconstitutional court decisions and the urgent need for leadership to restore order and constitutional integrity.
Join us for a thought-provoking examination of America's judicial system and the path forward.
🗣️ Quotes from Rick Joyner
"Our present state of government meltdown is not the failure of the Constitution, but rather our failure to comply with it."
"Our present state of government meltdown is not the failure of the Constitution, but rather our failure to comply with it."
"The greatest danger and biggest problem, judicial tyranny, could also be the easiest to fix."
🗣️ Quote from Benjamin Franklin
"How has it happened, sir, that we have not hitherto once thought of humbly applying to the Father of Lights to illuminate our understanding?"
"How has it happened, sir, that we have not hitherto once thought of humbly applying to the Father of Lights to illuminate our understanding?"
📝 Blog Post Body:
In the latest episode of the Morning Star Heritage Briefs, Chuck Christie addresses a critical issue plaguing the American government: judicial tyranny. This term, often used in political discourse, refers to judicial overreach, specifically when judges make decisions that exceed their constitutional authority. Christie argues that the current state of government dysfunction is not due to a failure of the Constitution itself, but rather a failure to adhere to its principles.
The Founding Fathers established a system of checks and balances designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. However, as Christie explains, these checks have been largely ignored, leading to a significant imbalance that threatens the very foundation of the Republic. He highlights historical examples, such as the Dred Scott decision, which illustrate the dangers of unconstitutional rulings.
One of the most alarming trends Christie discusses is the ability of a single federal judge to block presidential executive orders. This practice not only undermines the authority of the executive branch but also sets a dangerous precedent for future governance. According to Christie, this has evolved into judicial anarchy, in which judges act beyond their intended scope, leading to chaos within the government.
Furthermore, Christie emphasizes Congress's responsibility in this matter. He argues that Congress must reclaim its authority and hold judges accountable for their actions. The lack of leadership within Congress has allowed the judiciary to overstep its bounds, exacerbating the crises we face today. This call to action is not just about assigning blame; it's about finding solutions and restoring constitutional integrity.
As the episode progresses, Christie encourages listeners to remain hopeful. He reminds us that the greatest challenges often present the greatest opportunities for change. By looking back to the wisdom of the Founding Fathers and recognizing the importance of humility and accountability, we can work towards rectifying the current state of affairs.
In conclusion, this episode is a compelling exploration of judicial tyranny and its implications for American governance. Chuck Christie provides listeners with a thought-provoking analysis of the judicial system and encourages active engagement in the political process. For anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of our government and the importance of constitutional adherence, this episode is a must-listen.
✍️ Episode References
Morningstar Ministries
Federalist Papers
Thomas Jefferson
Dred Scott Decision
Gordon Leitner
Automatic Show Notes
Chapters
Long Summary
In this lecture, Chuck Christie presents "Judicial Tyranny, Heritage Brief 12," authored by Rick Joyner, which critically examines the state of the U.S. government through the lens of constitutional compliance. The fundamental argument asserts that the current governmental crisis is not a failure of the Constitution itself, but rather a failure of the various branches of government to adhere to its principles. The Founders established a robust system of checks and balances intended to maintain order and protect citizens' rights, yet these mechanisms have been systematically ignored, leading to an erosion of authority and increased judicial overreach.
Joyner highlights the concept of judicial tyranny, a term coined by Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers, which refers to the judiciary's potential to overstep its bounds and encroach upon legislative and executive powers. By examining various Supreme Court decisions, including the infamous Dred Scott case, the lecture illustrates how unconstitutional rulings have had lasting repercussions for social and political dynamics in the United States. Such decisions have not only contributed to existing divides but have also raised concerns about the potential for civil unrest reminiscent of the Civil War.
The lecture further explores the imbalance in the current interpretation of judicial power, particularly the alarming trend of individual federal judges striking down presidential executive orders without strong constitutional justification. This trend challenges the established principle of separation of powers, which explicitly assigns immigration policy and foreign affairs to the executive branch. Joyner warns that if this trend continues unchecked, it will wreak havoc on the foundations of American governance and could destabilize the very fabric of democratic order.
Expanding on these ideas, the lecture references the Federalist Papers and other writings of the Founders to elucidate their original intentions regarding the structure and function of government. The concept of Congress as the most powerful branch reflects the system's design, promoting accountability and responsiveness to the people. Joyner emphasizes that, in line with this vision, Congress not only has the exclusive authority to create laws but also the duty to protect executive powers from judicial encroachment. The failure of Congress to assert its authority has contributed significantly to the current state of chaos.
Ultimately, Joyner offers a glimmer of hope that the problematic nature of judicial tyranny is among the easier issues to rectify, contingent upon strong leadership and renewed adherence to constitutional principles. He underscores the importance of humility and of seeking divine guidance, as exemplified by the Founding Fathers, in navigating the tumultuous political landscape. Turning to a higher authority for wisdom offers the potential for restoration and recalibration of the government's intended structure. Thus, the lecture concludes with an appeal for profound leadership aligned with foundational values, ensuring the nation can rise above its current challenges and uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.
Brief Summary
In this lecture, Chuck Christie discusses "Judicial Tyranny, Heritage Brief 12," which critiques the failure of U.S. government branches to adhere to constitutional principles, rather than a flaw in the Constitution itself. Joyner explores the concept of judicial tyranny, highlighting pivotal Supreme Court decisions that have led to judicial overreach and a distortion of the separation of powers. He emphasizes Congress's role as the primary law-making body and warns of the consequences of its inaction. The lecture concludes with a call for strong leadership and a return to foundational values to restore constitutional order.
Transcript
[0:08] Introduction to Judicial Tyranny
[0:00] Hello again, this is Chuck Christie, bringing you another segment of the Morningstar Heritage Briefs. This episode is entitled Judicial Tyranny, Heritage Brief 12, by Rick Joyner.
[0:17] Our present state-of-government meltdown is not the failure of the Constitution, but rather our failure to comply with it.
[0:25] The Founders put in place adequate checks and balances to keep all three branches of the federal government in their lanes and prevent them from infringing on the rights of the states and the people, but they have been ignored. The answer to almost all of the crises we're facing today is to go back and comply with the supreme law of the land, the Constitution. All three branches of the federal government are responsible for this failure. But as Thomas Jefferson and other founders foresaw, what they called judicial tyranny was the biggest threat to the republic, and they have been proven right. For this reason, we are examining the judicial branch first. We do this acknowledging that many of the Founding Fathers were brilliant judges and justices who gave us what is still the best judicial system in the world. Yet, it is now close to running the entire government off the rails if it is not quickly returned to its constitutional moorings. We must do this while understanding that overreactions can be just as devastating as the wrong actions that got us here in the first place. This is not to find someone to blame, but rather to seek solutions.
[1:49] For every mistake made, there have likely been many decisions that our courts got right. There may be no more difficult job than being a judge at any level. Most judges deserve more honor and respect than they get. Even so, we must seek to understand the mistakes, or we will keep making them. Unconstitutional Supreme Court decisions, such as Dred Scott, which declared that slaves were not people but property, became a root cause of the Civil War.
[2:27] Unconstitutional court decisions are creating the most serious social fault lines in our country today, and they threaten to cause another Civil War. One extreme example of how far out of their lane some in the judiciary have gone: consider how it is now an accepted practice for a single federal judge to cancel a presidential executive order,
[2:55] The Role of the Judiciary
[2:53] As we have seen recently on immigration policy. Any judge who even attempted to do this should have been impeached and removed from the bench immediately for violating the Constitution. How does this violate the Constitution? First, this is a basic violation of the Separation of Powers Clause. Both the Constitution and federal law place immigration policy under foreign policy, which falls within the executive branch, not Congress or the judiciary.
[3:27] The Founders had the wisdom to see how much chaos would result if all three branches began to impose their own foreign policy, which is what we're witnessing today. Consider that there are hundreds of federal judges. It has been accepted today that any one of them can block a president's executive orders without even citing how the executive order violates the Constitution or the law. These judges do this simply because they disagree with the president's policies.
[4:03] It is not likely that any government could survive the whiplash caused by this kind of madness, and ours won't either. If a judge can get away with doing this to the executive branch, they can do it to Congress too, and they are. This has not only eroded executive and congressional authority but also the Constitution when it is so blatantly disregarded.
[4:29] Checks and Balances Explained
[4:30] This has now gone beyond judicial tyranny to become judicial anarchy. The Federalist Papers were written by several of the Founders to convince the states to adopt the Constitution. In these papers, they explained what was intended by each part of the Constitution. Therefore, we don't have to speculate about their intentions as just about everyone in office does today. We also have the founders' private and published writings, which often go into great detail about what they intended in our founding documents. One thing the founders made clear was that, in implementing three branches of government, they would serve as checks and balances on one another. They never intended for them to be co-equal, which is a very prevalent fallacy believed today. Their clearly stated intention was for Congress to be the most powerful of the three branches, which is why they gave Congress the power of the purse and the power to impeach.
[5:39] They wanted Congress to have these powers because they considered that it would be the most accountable and responsive to the people.
[5:49] The Constitution established the Supreme Court, but all other courts had to be established by Congress. Congress was expected to impeach and remove from office any judges who sought
[6:09] Congress's Powers and Responsibilities
[6:02] to usurp Congress's authority to make laws by legislating from the bench. Congress alone has the power to make laws, not the president nor the judicial branch. Congress was also expected to defend the executive branch's constitutional powers against judicial overreach. Because Congress has the power of the purse, it could just defund a court that went awry. The main reason these powers that only Congress has are not being used is a lack of leadership in Congress.
[6:41] By not taking their authority, the other two branches of government did so, resulting in the chaos we are now experiencing. It can be tempting to believe that things are now so far out of whack that we
[6:57] The Path to Resolution
[6:55] will never get them straight again. Not so. The greatest danger and biggest problem, judicial tyranny, could also be the easiest to fix. It will take extraordinary leadership, the likes of which we have not seen for a long time. Yet, it is always in the darkest of times that the greatest lights have arisen. In all things, we must look first to the one for whom nothing is impossible.
[7:25] That's what the founders learned to do, and the Lord came to their aid every time. He will do this for us as well if we keep Him first by always turning to Him first. Since He made it clear that He resists the proud but gives His grace to the humble, let us continue to humble ourselves before Him every way we can,
[7:52] A Call for Humility and Guidance
[7:48] Acknowledging our need for Him and being teachable enough to receive it.
In this situation of this assembly, groping as it were in the dark to find political truth, and scarce able to distinguish it, when presented to us, how has it happened, sir, that we have not hitherto once thought of humbly applying to the Father of lights to illuminate our understanding. Benjamin Franklin, at the Constitutional Convention.
They, the founders, foresaw that the machinery of government could become too large, that the military could become too weak, that the national debt could spiral out of control, that taxes could become too onerous, that laws could become too cumbersome, and that our efforts to help the poor and educate the young could become misdirected. Gordon Leidner.
Copyright 2020 by Rick Joyner. All rights reserved.
Comments
Post a Comment